You have reached your limit of 5 free stories. A story preview is shown instead.
To view more stories
(If your subscription is current,
click here to Login or Register.)
Followup To Electronic Animal Immobilizer
There was a mistake in your article about our Electronic Animal Immobilizer (Vol. 26, No. 3). The article stated that we are bringing back a product that was on the market in the early 1980's called "Stock Still". That was wrong. We are in no way associated with the Stock Still. Our Animal Immobilizer wasn't even inven
..........
You must sign in, subscribe or renew to see the page.
You must sign in, subscribe or renew to see the flip-book
Followup To Electronic Animal Immobilizer LIVESTOCK Handling 26-4-34 There was a mistake in your article about our Electronic Animal Immobilizer (Vol. 26, No. 3). The article stated that we are bringing back a product that was on the market in the early 1980's called "Stock Still". That was wrong. We are in no way associated with the Stock Still. Our Animal Immobilizer wasn't even invented back then. Our mechanism for immobilizing an animal is completely different. The Stock Still had serious side effects, which is why it was not successful. Our product has no negative effects on the animal and is safe for both the handler and animal. In fact, one of our biggest challenges has been to overcome the fears of ranchers and veterinarians because of their past experiences with the Stock Still. (James Keane-Murphy, I&G Distributors USA, 4965 Hidden Branches Dr., Atlanta, Ga. 30338 ph 770 350-0342; www.igd-usa.com)
To read the rest of this story, download this issue below or click
here to register with your account number.
